<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 358 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265083</link>
    <description>Disallowance of input tax credit and penalty was sustained where the purchasing dealers were found to be fictitious, the goods were traced to bogus transactions, and the verification report was not effectively challenged. The Tribunal treated the findings of bogus dealers and absence of genuine supporting bills as factual conclusions, and they were not shown to be perverse or erroneous. On that basis, the challenge raised no substantial question of law, so the Revenue&#039;s position prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 358 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265083</link>
      <description>Disallowance of input tax credit and penalty was sustained where the purchasing dealers were found to be fictitious, the goods were traced to bogus transactions, and the verification report was not effectively challenged. The Tribunal treated the findings of bogus dealers and absence of genuine supporting bills as factual conclusions, and they were not shown to be perverse or erroneous. On that basis, the challenge raised no substantial question of law, so the Revenue&#039;s position prevailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>