<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 357 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265082</link>
    <description>Post-clearance price escalation receipts were not automatically includible in excise assessable value because valuation depends on the price at the time of clearance. Absent material showing that the later payment formed part of the original sale price, or that the declared price was understated or depressed through any suspicious arrangement, the additional amount could not be added to transaction value. The assessee therefore succeeded on valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 357 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265082</link>
      <description>Post-clearance price escalation receipts were not automatically includible in excise assessable value because valuation depends on the price at the time of clearance. Absent material showing that the later payment formed part of the original sale price, or that the declared price was understated or depressed through any suspicious arrangement, the additional amount could not be added to transaction value. The assessee therefore succeeded on valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>