<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to deny Modvat credit on split air-conditioners, citing a previous case involving the appellants. However, Modvat credit for items like lamps, fluidic finish kit, and saipper pads was allowed as they were deemed essential for the manufacturing process. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to deny Modvat credit on split air-conditioners, citing a previous case involving the appellants. However, Modvat credit for items like lamps, fluidic finish kit, and saipper pads was allowed as they were deemed essential for the manufacturing process. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>