<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265057</link>
    <description>The judge ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case involving the denial of CENVAT Credit on items used in manufacturing steel and engineering products. The court found that the items in question were indeed used as components in the manufacturing process, supported by a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate and relevant case laws. As a result, the impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, making the Appellant eligible for CENVAT Credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:02:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265057</link>
      <description>The judge ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case involving the denial of CENVAT Credit on items used in manufacturing steel and engineering products. The court found that the items in question were indeed used as components in the manufacturing process, supported by a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate and relevant case laws. As a result, the impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, making the Appellant eligible for CENVAT Credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>