<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 330 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265055</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, so no notice was required when contraband was recovered from a concealed cavity in a vehicle. The Court also found that secret information was properly reduced into writing and forwarded to a superior officer, and that the search, seizure, and reporting complied with Sections 42 and 57. A delayed retraction of the Section 67 statement did not displace the prosecution case, because independent evidence from the raiding party, public witness, vehicle owner, and chemical report corroborated recovery of heroin from the vehicle. The conviction and sentence were therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:02:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 330 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265055</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, so no notice was required when contraband was recovered from a concealed cavity in a vehicle. The Court also found that secret information was properly reduced into writing and forwarded to a superior officer, and that the search, seizure, and reporting complied with Sections 42 and 57. A delayed retraction of the Section 67 statement did not displace the prosecution case, because independent evidence from the raiding party, public witness, vehicle owner, and chemical report corroborated recovery of heroin from the vehicle. The conviction and sentence were therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>