https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265051 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant for the confiscated imported goods. The Tribunal found that the appellant had complied with necessary procedures, including providing the pre-shipment inspection certificate and contract documentation, absolving them of liability for the live bomb shells found in the consignment. The decision emphasized the lack of evidence showing the appellant's awareness of the prohibited items and rejected the Revenue's argument for additional penalties or precautions. The only items to be confiscated were the live bomb shells, with the rest of the goods cleared without penalty. en-us Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265051 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant for the confiscated imported goods. The Tribunal found that the appellant had complied with necessary procedures, including providing the pre-shipment inspection certificate and contract documentation, absolving them of liability for the live bomb shells found in the consignment. The decision emphasized the lack of evidence showing the appellant's awareness of the prohibited items and rejected the Revenue's argument for additional penalties or precautions. The only items to be confiscated were the live bomb shells, with the rest of the goods cleared without penalty. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265051