<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 322 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265047</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal on the disallowance of interest on borrowed capital due to the lack of independent reasoning. The Court emphasized the necessity of transparent and accountable decision-making processes, highlighting the Tribunal&#039;s failure to provide proper justification. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance of interest lacked a clear nexus between interest-free advances and borrowed funds, leading to questions about the decision&#039;s substantive analysis. The Court raised concerns about the Tribunal&#039;s failure to appreciate the profitability covering the advances and the timing of advances affecting the interest disallowance, indicating deficiencies in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 322 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265047</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal on the disallowance of interest on borrowed capital due to the lack of independent reasoning. The Court emphasized the necessity of transparent and accountable decision-making processes, highlighting the Tribunal&#039;s failure to provide proper justification. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s disallowance of interest lacked a clear nexus between interest-free advances and borrowed funds, leading to questions about the decision&#039;s substantive analysis. The Court raised concerns about the Tribunal&#039;s failure to appreciate the profitability covering the advances and the timing of advances affecting the interest disallowance, indicating deficiencies in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>