<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 310 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the CIT(A) due to lack of justification and basis for the disallowances. The disallowance of expenditure for denting &amp;amp; painting expenses and job charges was found unjustified as they were related to warranty schemes, with no non-business expenses identified. Additionally, the disallowance of rebate &amp;amp; discount expenses and various expenses was considered arbitrary and lacking basis, leading to the deletion of these disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 05:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 310 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the CIT(A) due to lack of justification and basis for the disallowances. The disallowance of expenditure for denting &amp;amp; painting expenses and job charges was found unjustified as they were related to warranty schemes, with no non-business expenses identified. Additionally, the disallowance of rebate &amp;amp; discount expenses and various expenses was considered arbitrary and lacking basis, leading to the deletion of these disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>