<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 302 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265027</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of Rs. 33,58,000 as explained cash receipts but confirmed the addition of Rs. 94,500 as unexplained cash credit. The ITAT remanded the issue of interest under sections 234B and 234C for further examination. The judgment emphasized the necessity of providing evidence for cash deposits and adhering to tax laws to prevent additions as unexplained income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 302 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265027</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of Rs. 33,58,000 as explained cash receipts but confirmed the addition of Rs. 94,500 as unexplained cash credit. The ITAT remanded the issue of interest under sections 234B and 234C for further examination. The judgment emphasized the necessity of providing evidence for cash deposits and adhering to tax laws to prevent additions as unexplained income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>