<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (12) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174301</link>
    <description>Undefined eligibility terms in a medical recruitment scheme must be construed in light of the Act&#039;s purpose and regulatory context, so teaching experience was not confined to Indian institutions and could include recognised foreign teaching institutions. Service as a Registrar could also qualify where the duties involved teaching functions, and academic certificates were entitled to weight absent clear reason to doubt them. A candidate who met the regulatory standard was entitled to fair consideration; exclusion without correct application of the rules was illegal. Judicial review could set aside that illegality and require fresh consideration, while leaving the final appointment decision to the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (12) TMI 74 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174301</link>
      <description>Undefined eligibility terms in a medical recruitment scheme must be construed in light of the Act&#039;s purpose and regulatory context, so teaching experience was not confined to Indian institutions and could include recognised foreign teaching institutions. Service as a Registrar could also qualify where the duties involved teaching functions, and academic certificates were entitled to weight absent clear reason to doubt them. A candidate who met the regulatory standard was entitled to fair consideration; exclusion without correct application of the rules was illegal. Judicial review could set aside that illegality and require fresh consideration, while leaving the final appointment decision to the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>