<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174299</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition while expressly preserving the petitioners&#039; liberty to issue an additional show cause notice. The order is confined to that procedural disposition and does not record any substantive determination on the underlying dispute or legal questions. Its operative effect is limited to dismissal of the petition with leave reserved for further notice action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174299</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition while expressly preserving the petitioners&#039; liberty to issue an additional show cause notice. The order is confined to that procedural disposition and does not record any substantive determination on the underlying dispute or legal questions. Its operative effect is limited to dismissal of the petition with leave reserved for further notice action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>