https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=560 The Tribunal dismissed the duty demand of Rs. 18,34,560 against appellant No. 1 for clandestine activities due to lack of concrete evidence. Penalties imposed on all appellants were set aside as there was insufficient proof to support the allegations. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual evidence over assumptions in proving charges of clandestine activities, leading to the allowance of the appellants' appeals with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=560 The Tribunal dismissed the duty demand of Rs. 18,34,560 against appellant No. 1 for clandestine activities due to lack of concrete evidence. Penalties imposed on all appellants were set aside as there was insufficient proof to support the allegations. The judgment emphasized the importance of factual evidence over assumptions in proving charges of clandestine activities, leading to the allowance of the appellants' appeals with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=560