<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1102 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for excess cash detected and unexplained investment in stock for the assessment year 2003-04. The Tribunal ruled that the penalty could not be sustained as the Assessing Officer failed to provide a clear finding on whether the appellant had concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars, as required by previous court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1102 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for excess cash detected and unexplained investment in stock for the assessment year 2003-04. The Tribunal ruled that the penalty could not be sustained as the Assessing Officer failed to provide a clear finding on whether the appellant had concealed income or furnished inaccurate particulars, as required by previous court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>