https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174293 An appeal against an order of remand under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to the discipline of second appellate jurisdiction: the High Court must limit itself to substantial questions of law and cannot reappreciate evidence or reopen pure findings of fact. The Court held that no substantial question of law had been framed and the High Court's minute factual scrutiny was beyond jurisdiction. On construction of the sale deed, the instrument must be read as a whole, and where the body of the deed and the schedule conflict, the recital in the body prevails if it reflects the parties' true intention. The disputed property was therefore not conveyed. en-us Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174293 An appeal against an order of remand under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure is confined to the discipline of second appellate jurisdiction: the High Court must limit itself to substantial questions of law and cannot reappreciate evidence or reopen pure findings of fact. The Court held that no substantial question of law had been framed and the High Court's minute factual scrutiny was beyond jurisdiction. On construction of the sale deed, the instrument must be read as a whole, and where the body of the deed and the schedule conflict, the recital in the body prevails if it reflects the parties' true intention. The disputed property was therefore not conveyed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174293