<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174290</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order. The appellant was found to have substantially complied with the court order conditions regarding the discharge of the mortgage and compliance with the court order. The respondent was directed to execute the sale deed in favor of the appellant, with no costs awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174290</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order. The appellant was found to have substantially complied with the court order conditions regarding the discharge of the mortgage and compliance with the court order. The respondent was directed to execute the sale deed in favor of the appellant, with no costs awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>