<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 978 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174287</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC set aside the Prothonotary&#039;s order, restoring the appeal. However, an office objection was raised due to jurisdictional issues as the notice and order were issued by authorities in Pudhucherry. The appeal was directed to be presented before the relevant court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 978 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174287</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC set aside the Prothonotary&#039;s order, restoring the appeal. However, an office objection was raised due to jurisdictional issues as the notice and order were issued by authorities in Pudhucherry. The appeal was directed to be presented before the relevant court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>