https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174276 Revisional interference under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act was refused because the concurrent factual findings showed that the goods were accompanied by the relevant documents, including Form No. 47, and that no tax evasion was established. The revisional court held that, where the tax authorities, the appellate authority and the Tax Board all found the documents had been produced at the time of checking and no question of law arose, interference was not justified. The concurrent findings were therefore left undisturbed and the revision was not entertained on merits. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:48:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174276 Revisional interference under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act was refused because the concurrent factual findings showed that the goods were accompanied by the relevant documents, including Form No. 47, and that no tax evasion was established. The revisional court held that, where the tax authorities, the appellate authority and the Tax Board all found the documents had been produced at the time of checking and no question of law arose, interference was not justified. The concurrent findings were therefore left undisturbed and the revision was not entertained on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174276