<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174274</link>
    <description>SC upheld state government&#039;s agreements with industrial units for sal seed supply at concessional royalty rates. Court found the weighted average formula for royalty fixation had rational basis and was not arbitrary or discriminatory. The protective policy measure of assured supply to selected units at concessional rates was deemed valid. HC&#039;s earlier direction for royalty redetermination through arbitration was affirmed. Appeals dismissed with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174274</link>
      <description>SC upheld state government&#039;s agreements with industrial units for sal seed supply at concessional royalty rates. Court found the weighted average formula for royalty fixation had rational basis and was not arbitrary or discriminatory. The protective policy measure of assured supply to selected units at concessional rates was deemed valid. HC&#039;s earlier direction for royalty redetermination through arbitration was affirmed. Appeals dismissed with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>