<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174272</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of without additional directions as the learned Single Judge did not make a reference under Section 21 of The Competition Act, 2002. The respondent&#039;s counsel indicated their intention to file a formal application under Section 19 of the Act with the Competition Commission. The appellant retains the right to contest any such application on all available grounds, and no further judicial orders were necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174272</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of without additional directions as the learned Single Judge did not make a reference under Section 21 of The Competition Act, 2002. The respondent&#039;s counsel indicated their intention to file a formal application under Section 19 of the Act with the Competition Commission. The appellant retains the right to contest any such application on all available grounds, and no further judicial orders were necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>