<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 922 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174267</link>
    <description>The Court addressed challenges to orders in a Central Excise Appeal, directing the petitioner to pay a penalty and seeking an interim measure. Disputes arose over an order of attachment and the Tribunal&#039;s decision on dispensation of pre-deposit. The Court criticized the Tribunal&#039;s approach and directed prompt reconsideration of orders. It allowed the writ petition despite alternative remedies, emphasizing the need for the petitioner&#039;s presence during decisions. The Court directed the Tribunal to expedite disposal of applications and imposed conditions to safeguard revenue&#039;s interest, including a Bank Guarantee and restriction on alienating assets. The judgment clarified allegations were not admitted and ordered prompt supply of a certified copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 922 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174267</link>
      <description>The Court addressed challenges to orders in a Central Excise Appeal, directing the petitioner to pay a penalty and seeking an interim measure. Disputes arose over an order of attachment and the Tribunal&#039;s decision on dispensation of pre-deposit. The Court criticized the Tribunal&#039;s approach and directed prompt reconsideration of orders. It allowed the writ petition despite alternative remedies, emphasizing the need for the petitioner&#039;s presence during decisions. The Court directed the Tribunal to expedite disposal of applications and imposed conditions to safeguard revenue&#039;s interest, including a Bank Guarantee and restriction on alienating assets. The judgment clarified allegations were not admitted and ordered prompt supply of a certified copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>