https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174262 The Supreme Court dismissed the central excise appeal after the Attorney General stated that the amount involved was very small and Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was no longer in operation. On that basis, the appeal was not pressed and delay was condoned. The order reflects a non-adjudicatory disposal without examination of the underlying excise issue. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:40:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174262 The Supreme Court dismissed the central excise appeal after the Attorney General stated that the amount involved was very small and Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was no longer in operation. On that basis, the appeal was not pressed and delay was condoned. The order reflects a non-adjudicatory disposal without examination of the underlying excise issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174262