<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 588 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174257</link>
    <description>The Trade Tax Tribunal&#039;s orders were set aside, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the dealer was to be assessed based on the first appellate authority&#039;s orders. The revisions were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:08:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 588 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174257</link>
      <description>The Trade Tax Tribunal&#039;s orders were set aside, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the dealer was to be assessed based on the first appellate authority&#039;s orders. The revisions were allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>