<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1238 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174251</link>
    <description>The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for de novo consideration in accordance with law, so the dispute was not finally resolved on the merits. The appellate outcome was that fresh adjudication was required before the Tribunal, and the appeal was allowed only to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1238 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174251</link>
      <description>The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for de novo consideration in accordance with law, so the dispute was not finally resolved on the merits. The appellate outcome was that fresh adjudication was required before the Tribunal, and the appeal was allowed only to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>