<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 774 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174248</link>
    <description>The appeals were treated as covered by the binding precedent in Escorts JCB Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-II, so the Court found no need for fresh adjudication on the point in controversy. The stated legal effect was that the earlier decision governed the issue under stare decisis, and the present appeals were resolved accordingly in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 12:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 774 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174248</link>
      <description>The appeals were treated as covered by the binding precedent in Escorts JCB Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-II, so the Court found no need for fresh adjudication on the point in controversy. The stated legal effect was that the earlier decision governed the issue under stare decisis, and the present appeals were resolved accordingly in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>