<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 21 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=553</link>
    <description>Programming imported pagers before clearance, together with labelling and sticker-packing, was treated as manufacture under Note 6 of Section XVI because the goods were not usable as pagers without that processing; the duty demand was therefore sustained. Cum-duty valuation was also accepted on the basis of the governing Supreme Court principle applied by the Tribunal, and the revenue&#039;s challenge on valuation failed. Personal penalties on the director and general manager were set aside because the record did not establish omission or commission with intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 21 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=553</link>
      <description>Programming imported pagers before clearance, together with labelling and sticker-packing, was treated as manufacture under Note 6 of Section XVI because the goods were not usable as pagers without that processing; the duty demand was therefore sustained. Cum-duty valuation was also accepted on the basis of the governing Supreme Court principle applied by the Tribunal, and the revenue&#039;s challenge on valuation failed. Personal penalties on the director and general manager were set aside because the record did not establish omission or commission with intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>