<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 297 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265022</link>
    <description>The Authority ruled that the relationship between the club and its members constitutes a provision of &#039;service&#039; under the Finance Act, 1994, making Membership fees, Annual fees, and other charges received from members liable for Service Tax. However, the Authority determined that the refundable security deposit and any interest earned on it should not be subjected to Service Tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 297 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265022</link>
      <description>The Authority ruled that the relationship between the club and its members constitutes a provision of &#039;service&#039; under the Finance Act, 1994, making Membership fees, Annual fees, and other charges received from members liable for Service Tax. However, the Authority determined that the refundable security deposit and any interest earned on it should not be subjected to Service Tax under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>