https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265017 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue's appeal against the setting aside of the Adjudication order. The appellant's eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit based on invoices endorsed by the Head Office, not registered as an Input Service Distributor, was deemed valid. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with registration requirements and proper credit distribution practices, citing relevant case laws and the Master Circular. Previous Tribunal decisions supporting the appellant's position were considered, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal and affirmation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order. en-us Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265017 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue's appeal against the setting aside of the Adjudication order. The appellant's eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit based on invoices endorsed by the Head Office, not registered as an Input Service Distributor, was deemed valid. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with registration requirements and proper credit distribution practices, citing relevant case laws and the Master Circular. Previous Tribunal decisions supporting the appellant's position were considered, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal and affirmation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265017