<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 279 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265004</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on detergent soap supplied free with detergent powder was rejected. The case involved repacking bulk detergent into retail packs with a free detergent soap offer. The Revenue argued that detergent soap is not an eligible input for Cenvat credit, while the respondents cited relevant legal provisions and precedents. The Member upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the correct labeling and discharge of duty on the combined product. The impugned order was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 17.3.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 279 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265004</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on detergent soap supplied free with detergent powder was rejected. The case involved repacking bulk detergent into retail packs with a free detergent soap offer. The Revenue argued that detergent soap is not an eligible input for Cenvat credit, while the respondents cited relevant legal provisions and precedents. The Member upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the correct labeling and discharge of duty on the combined product. The impugned order was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 17.3.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>