<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 269 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and disposed of all related appeals due to the unsustainability of the order against the appellant. The case involved issues of alleged violation of conditions of Advance Licences, repetitive litigation, and non-compliance with pre-deposit directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal directives and concluded that addressing the same license for the same cause in two separate adjudication orders was impermissible. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the present adjudication was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 269 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and disposed of all related appeals due to the unsustainability of the order against the appellant. The case involved issues of alleged violation of conditions of Advance Licences, repetitive litigation, and non-compliance with pre-deposit directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal directives and concluded that addressing the same license for the same cause in two separate adjudication orders was impermissible. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the present adjudication was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>