<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264990</link>
    <description>In rectification proceedings under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Company Law Board cannot refuse relief merely by labelling the matter as one involving title and succession if the entitlement is already supported by an operative succession certificate and executed transfer deeds. Where no real dispute of title survives and the documents clearly establish transmission of shares, summary jurisdiction remains available and rectification may be ordered without requiring a civil trial. A pending challenge to the succession certificate or an alleged stay does not, by itself, negate the documents conferring entitlement. The register could therefore be corrected in favour of the respondent group.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 265 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264990</link>
      <description>In rectification proceedings under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, the Company Law Board cannot refuse relief merely by labelling the matter as one involving title and succession if the entitlement is already supported by an operative succession certificate and executed transfer deeds. Where no real dispute of title survives and the documents clearly establish transmission of shares, summary jurisdiction remains available and rectification may be ordered without requiring a civil trial. A pending challenge to the succession certificate or an alleged stay does not, by itself, negate the documents conferring entitlement. The register could therefore be corrected in favour of the respondent group.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>