<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 261 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264986</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the subsequent re-assessment order were invalid. It was determined that all material particulars had been disclosed during the original assessment, and the issues raised were not indicative of a failure to disclose but rather a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the re-assessment proceedings were deemed unnecessary, and the notice and order were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 261 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264986</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the subsequent re-assessment order were invalid. It was determined that all material particulars had been disclosed during the original assessment, and the issues raised were not indicative of a failure to disclose but rather a change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the re-assessment proceedings were deemed unnecessary, and the notice and order were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>