<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 252 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264977</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Tribunal to delete a Trading addition made by the Assessing Officer based on a declined Gross Profit rate and rejection of Books of Account under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2003-04. The court emphasized that rejection of Books of Account does not automatically warrant additional income additions and that mere deviation in Gross Profit rate does not justify estimation or interference with trading results if the data in the trading account is correct. The appeal was dismissed based on factual findings, with no substantial legal questions identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:38:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 252 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264977</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and Tribunal to delete a Trading addition made by the Assessing Officer based on a declined Gross Profit rate and rejection of Books of Account under Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2003-04. The court emphasized that rejection of Books of Account does not automatically warrant additional income additions and that mere deviation in Gross Profit rate does not justify estimation or interference with trading results if the data in the trading account is correct. The appeal was dismissed based on factual findings, with no substantial legal questions identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>