<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 244 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues. The Tribunal ruled that no disallowance was warranted under Section 36(1)(va) for the late payment of ESIC contributions, and similarly, no disallowance of proportionate interest was justified for the interest-free loans and advances extended for non-business purposes. The appeal was thus allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:38:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 244 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s orders on both issues. The Tribunal ruled that no disallowance was warranted under Section 36(1)(va) for the late payment of ESIC contributions, and similarly, no disallowance of proportionate interest was justified for the interest-free loans and advances extended for non-business purposes. The appeal was thus allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>