<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 242 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the provision for lease equalization charges should not be added back to the book profit for tax computation under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to RBI guidelines and Accounting Standard-19, highlighting the need to exclude the excess principle portion in lease installments over depreciation for accurate profit recognition. The decision underscored the limited power of Assessing Officers in examining book profits and directed deletion of the addition if the provision was correctly accounted for, setting a precedent for similar disputes on provision accounting and tax computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 242 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the provision for lease equalization charges should not be added back to the book profit for tax computation under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to RBI guidelines and Accounting Standard-19, highlighting the need to exclude the excess principle portion in lease installments over depreciation for accurate profit recognition. The decision underscored the limited power of Assessing Officers in examining book profits and directed deletion of the addition if the provision was correctly accounted for, setting a precedent for similar disputes on provision accounting and tax computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>