<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 240 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264965</link>
    <description>Compensation paid for damage to land caused by laying an underground pipeline was treated as a capital receipt, because it was received for injury to the land itself and not as income from its ordinary exploitation. The land was not transferred, and the payment was not shown to be recurring income or a substitute for profit. On that basis, the amount was not chargeable as revenue income and the tax addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 240 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264965</link>
      <description>Compensation paid for damage to land caused by laying an underground pipeline was treated as a capital receipt, because it was received for injury to the land itself and not as income from its ordinary exploitation. The land was not transferred, and the payment was not shown to be recurring income or a substitute for profit. On that basis, the amount was not chargeable as revenue income and the tax addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>