<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments by the Revenue for different years, disallowing foreign travel expenses, was barred by limitation under section 150 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that its observations did not constitute directions under the Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal clarified that the observations should not set a precedent for regular assessment proceedings and found the reopened assessments unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments by the Revenue for different years, disallowing foreign travel expenses, was barred by limitation under section 150 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that its observations did not constitute directions under the Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal clarified that the observations should not set a precedent for regular assessment proceedings and found the reopened assessments unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>