<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA (CHANDIGARH)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=538</link>
    <description>The court ruled that clearance of goods under Section 47 of the Customs Act does not prevent further adjudication or confiscation proceedings. However, the seizure of goods was deemed illegal due to the lack of recorded reasons as required by Sections 105 and 110 of the Act. The court ordered the release of the seized goods and instructed the respondents to finalize all pending proceedings within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA (CHANDIGARH)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=538</link>
      <description>The court ruled that clearance of goods under Section 47 of the Customs Act does not prevent further adjudication or confiscation proceedings. However, the seizure of goods was deemed illegal due to the lack of recorded reasons as required by Sections 105 and 110 of the Act. The court ordered the release of the seized goods and instructed the respondents to finalize all pending proceedings within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>