<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264956</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on outward transportation was treated as admissible for FOR sales where transportation charges were included in the assessable value and ownership and risk remained with the seller until delivery, consistent with the applicable CBEC circular. Credit on freight from the factory to the depot was not finally decided; the question turned on whether the transportation element had already been built into the selling price and required factual verification by the adjudicating authority. The dispute was therefore partly resolved in favour of credit eligibility for FOR basis sales and partly remitted for examination of the depot-related freight claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264956</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on outward transportation was treated as admissible for FOR sales where transportation charges were included in the assessable value and ownership and risk remained with the seller until delivery, consistent with the applicable CBEC circular. Credit on freight from the factory to the depot was not finally decided; the question turned on whether the transportation element had already been built into the selling price and required factual verification by the adjudicating authority. The dispute was therefore partly resolved in favour of credit eligibility for FOR basis sales and partly remitted for examination of the depot-related freight claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>