<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264956</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for verification. It was determined that for goods sold on FOR basis, where transportation charges were included in the assessable value and ownership remained with the appellant until delivery, Cenvat Credit on outward transportation was permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264956</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for verification. It was determined that for goods sold on FOR basis, where transportation charges were included in the assessable value and ownership remained with the appellant until delivery, Cenvat Credit on outward transportation was permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>