<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 229 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264954</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE upheld a demand of &amp;amp;8377; 32,50,113/- against an appellant for providing construction services classified under commercial or industrial construction service and works contract service without paying Service Tax. The Tribunal deemed construction activities for entities like SCCL as industrial, making them liable for Service Tax. The Tribunal acknowledged the limitation period for the demand, emphasizing the importance of pre-deposit compliance. Despite a partial deposit, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit an additional &amp;amp;8377; 10 lakhs within six weeks to avoid appeal rejection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 229 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264954</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE upheld a demand of &amp;amp;8377; 32,50,113/- against an appellant for providing construction services classified under commercial or industrial construction service and works contract service without paying Service Tax. The Tribunal deemed construction activities for entities like SCCL as industrial, making them liable for Service Tax. The Tribunal acknowledged the limitation period for the demand, emphasizing the importance of pre-deposit compliance. Despite a partial deposit, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit an additional &amp;amp;8377; 10 lakhs within six weeks to avoid appeal rejection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>