<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 218 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264943</link>
    <description>Keo Karpin Baby Oil was treated as a medicine or drug rather than a cosmetic for sales tax classification purposes under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act rate notification. The court noted that the notification separately covered medicines and cosmetics, and the Revenue had not discharged the burden of showing that the product fell within the cosmetic entry because its ingredients, label and literature were not properly examined. Earlier judicial findings on its chemical composition, manufacture under a drug licence and prophylactic qualities were followed, with the settled classification view maintained where the facts and law remained unchanged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 218 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264943</link>
      <description>Keo Karpin Baby Oil was treated as a medicine or drug rather than a cosmetic for sales tax classification purposes under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act rate notification. The court noted that the notification separately covered medicines and cosmetics, and the Revenue had not discharged the burden of showing that the product fell within the cosmetic entry because its ingredients, label and literature were not properly examined. Earlier judicial findings on its chemical composition, manufacture under a drug licence and prophylactic qualities were followed, with the settled classification view maintained where the facts and law remained unchanged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>