<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 215 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264940</link>
    <description>The court held that the revisional authority&#039;s actions were beyond the three-year limitation period as per section 34 of the HVAT Act. The acknowledgment of the return filed on November 19, 2004, was deemed the valid assessment order, rendering the subsequent orders invalid. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and deciding the substantial questions of law in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 215 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264940</link>
      <description>The court held that the revisional authority&#039;s actions were beyond the three-year limitation period as per section 34 of the HVAT Act. The acknowledgment of the return filed on November 19, 2004, was deemed the valid assessment order, rendering the subsequent orders invalid. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and deciding the substantial questions of law in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>