<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 214 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264939</link>
    <description>The court held that M/s. VM Extrusions Private Limited was entitled to exemption from entry tax based on the principle of promissory estoppel. The court found that the 2001-06 Policy, which provided incentives including entry tax exemption, applied to the respondent despite a subsequent notification limiting the exemption. The court emphasized the government&#039;s obligation to fulfill promises made, supporting the application of promissory estoppel due to the respondent&#039;s reliance and the government&#039;s delay. The judgment granting the exemption from the date of commercial production in 2004 was upheld, dismissing the State Government&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:40:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 214 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264939</link>
      <description>The court held that M/s. VM Extrusions Private Limited was entitled to exemption from entry tax based on the principle of promissory estoppel. The court found that the 2001-06 Policy, which provided incentives including entry tax exemption, applied to the respondent despite a subsequent notification limiting the exemption. The court emphasized the government&#039;s obligation to fulfill promises made, supporting the application of promissory estoppel due to the respondent&#039;s reliance and the government&#039;s delay. The judgment granting the exemption from the date of commercial production in 2004 was upheld, dismissing the State Government&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>