<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 206 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264931</link>
    <description>A Customs House Agent was found not liable to penalty because it had obtained the exporter&#039;s authorisation, verified the IEC and bank account particulars, and taken reasonable steps to check the new client&#039;s credentials. The law did not require a personal meeting as a precondition for handling the shipment, and the record did not show knowledge of any fraudulent scheme or of shipping bills being filed to claim undue drawback through overvaluation. The Revenue&#039;s relied-upon authorities were held distinguishable on facts, and no violation of the Customs Act or other law was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 206 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264931</link>
      <description>A Customs House Agent was found not liable to penalty because it had obtained the exporter&#039;s authorisation, verified the IEC and bank account particulars, and taken reasonable steps to check the new client&#039;s credentials. The law did not require a personal meeting as a precondition for handling the shipment, and the record did not show knowledge of any fraudulent scheme or of shipping bills being filed to claim undue drawback through overvaluation. The Revenue&#039;s relied-upon authorities were held distinguishable on facts, and no violation of the Customs Act or other law was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>