<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 203 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant by setting aside the composite penalty imposed under various sections of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of aiding and abetting in smuggling activities and followed a legal precedent disallowing composite penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 203 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant by setting aside the composite penalty imposed under various sections of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of aiding and abetting in smuggling activities and followed a legal precedent disallowing composite penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>