<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 200 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, allowing the appeals and providing consequential relief. The issue involved converting timber logs from Hoppus Ton to cubic meter for sales, with the appellants using a conversion formula of 1 Hoppus Ton to 1.416 cubic meters, while authorities insisted on the international standard of 1.8027 cubic meters. Lower authorities and evidence supported the appellants&#039; formula, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 200 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, allowing the appeals and providing consequential relief. The issue involved converting timber logs from Hoppus Ton to cubic meter for sales, with the appellants using a conversion formula of 1 Hoppus Ton to 1.416 cubic meters, while authorities insisted on the international standard of 1.8027 cubic meters. Lower authorities and evidence supported the appellants&#039; formula, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>