<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 188 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264913</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai upheld M/s. Neotric Informatique Ltd.&#039;s classification of imported goods under CTH 8473 30 99, rejecting the duty demand, confiscation, and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s classification based on a bona fide belief, common trade parlance, and past practices to be valid. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s allegations of misdeclaration and suppression of facts, rejecting the extended period invocation and penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision provided relief to the appellant and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:38:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 188 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264913</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai upheld M/s. Neotric Informatique Ltd.&#039;s classification of imported goods under CTH 8473 30 99, rejecting the duty demand, confiscation, and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s classification based on a bona fide belief, common trade parlance, and past practices to be valid. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s allegations of misdeclaration and suppression of facts, rejecting the extended period invocation and penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision provided relief to the appellant and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>