<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 18 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=529</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the amendment excluding job work value from the computation of aggregate clearances under Notification No. 9/2003 should be applied simply and directly without the need for retrospective or prospective considerations. The Tribunal emphasized the clear wording of the amendment and its direct impact on the computation for the previous year, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the stay applications and appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 18 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=529</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the amendment excluding job work value from the computation of aggregate clearances under Notification No. 9/2003 should be applied simply and directly without the need for retrospective or prospective considerations. The Tribunal emphasized the clear wording of the amendment and its direct impact on the computation for the previous year, setting aside the impugned orders and allowing the stay applications and appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>