<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 147 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty on rejected inputs but set aside demands and penalties on other issues concerning Cenvat Credit and liability for duty. Emphasizing the significance of legal precedents and factual analysis, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for an extension of the stay order as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 147 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty on rejected inputs but set aside demands and penalties on other issues concerning Cenvat Credit and liability for duty. Emphasizing the significance of legal precedents and factual analysis, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for an extension of the stay order as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>