<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264870</link>
    <description>An independent body builder using chassis on which automobile cess had already been paid was treated, at the prima facie stage, as not liable to pay the cess again. The order applied a Board circular stating that automobile cess was intended for vehicle manufacturers and not for independent body builders where cess had already been paid on the chassis; it also noted that the circular remained in force and had been issued in consultation with the Administrative Ministry. Chapter Note 5 of Chapter 87 was not taken to displace that clarification at the stay stage, and a strong prima facie case was found. Pre-deposit was waived and recovery of cess, demand, interest and penalty was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264870</link>
      <description>An independent body builder using chassis on which automobile cess had already been paid was treated, at the prima facie stage, as not liable to pay the cess again. The order applied a Board circular stating that automobile cess was intended for vehicle manufacturers and not for independent body builders where cess had already been paid on the chassis; it also noted that the circular remained in force and had been issued in consultation with the Administrative Ministry. Chapter Note 5 of Chapter 87 was not taken to displace that clarification at the stay stage, and a strong prima facie case was found. Pre-deposit was waived and recovery of cess, demand, interest and penalty was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>