<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount of the cenvat credit demand within a designated timeframe, with the requirement of pre-deposit for the balance amount, interest, and penalty being waived upon timely compliance. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the liability of the appellant to reverse the credit under Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for inputs in stock, finished products, and work in progress after E-bikes became fully exempt from duty. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the application of Rule 11(3) based on separate imports of inputs for E-bikes and spare parts, leading to a cenvat credit demand and penalty against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount of the cenvat credit demand within a designated timeframe, with the requirement of pre-deposit for the balance amount, interest, and penalty being waived upon timely compliance. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision regarding the liability of the appellant to reverse the credit under Rule 11(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for inputs in stock, finished products, and work in progress after E-bikes became fully exempt from duty. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the application of Rule 11(3) based on separate imports of inputs for E-bikes and spare parts, leading to a cenvat credit demand and penalty against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>